Generative AI: 1. Ethics 2.CLIP: Difference between revisions
Cindy.tang (talk | contribs) |
Cindy.tang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
* '''Documentation and Dissemination''': Create a comprehensive Wikipedia page summarizing the project's findings. | * '''Documentation and Dissemination''': Create a comprehensive Wikipedia page summarizing the project's findings. | ||
* '''Final Deliverables''': Compile all project materials, including a well-documented GitHub repository. | * '''Final Deliverables''': Compile all project materials, including a well-documented GitHub repository. | ||
==Deliverables== | |||
==Methodology== | ==Methodology== | ||
===Ethical Theories=== | |||
===Data=== | ===Data=== | ||
===Model Selection=== | ===Model Selection=== | ||
Line 129: | Line 134: | ||
===Performance Evaluation=== | ===Performance Evaluation=== | ||
==Quality Assessment== | |||
==Limitations== | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 08:27, 12 December 2023
Motivation
In the current era, the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 or LLAMA has evoked a mix of fascination and concern. These advanced models showcase remarkable capabilities by generating human-like text and performing complex tasks, while also raising profound ethical questions.
Embedding ethics into AI systems stands as a considerable challenge, lacking “common approaches” of applied ethics.[1] Primarily, the ever-evolving impact of artificial intelligence across scientific, engineering, and human culture permanently demands innovative strategies to handle new AI ethics challenges. Furthermore, complexities arise from the persistent conflicts among different ethical norms, understanding and evaluating the consequences of actions remains a complex task, and most ethical decisions depend on subjective judgments.
Our project aims to delve into this multifaceted ethical landscape surrounding AI from both technical and philosophical perspectives. We want to explore how AI systems deal with ethical dilemmas in the light of these diverging ethical priorities and seek methods to align these systems more closely with human ethical values. Additionally, we aim to investigate whether and how these AI systems could maintain a form of consistency in their ethical considerations in the middle of this plurality of ethical principles.
Project Plan and Milestones
Weekly Plan
Date | Task | Completion |
---|---|---|
Week 4 |
|
√ |
Week 5 |
|
√ |
Week 6 |
|
√ |
Week 7 |
|
√ |
Week 8 |
|
√ |
Week 9 |
|
√ |
Week 10 |
|
√ |
Week 11 |
|
√ |
Week 12 |
|
|
Week 13 |
|
|
Week 14 |
|
Milestone 1
- Define Research Questions: Establish clear, focused questions to guide the project.
- Literature Review: Conduct a comprehensive review of existing studies in AI ethics.
- Ethical Theory Exploration: Investigate various ethical theories to ground your research in a solid theoretical framework.
- Ethical Dataset Identification: Locate datasets for quantitative AI ethics evaluation, such as red teaming datasets.
Milestone 2
- Refine Research Goals: Sharpen the focus and scope of the research based on initial findings.
- Dataset Finalization: Select the most appropriate dataset after exploration and evaluation.
- Model Selection and Fine-Tuning: Settle on the LLaMA model and fine-tune it by deploying GPU resources.
- Model Evaluation: Conduct a thorough evaluation of the model, focusing on its ethical implications and performance.
Milestone 3
- Develop Advanced Models: Implement Preference and Reinforcement learning models, integrating them with the fine-tuned LLaMA model.
- In-Depth Analysis: Analyze the models' outcomes, assessing performance, identifying defects, and investigating specific issues like coherence and degeneration.
- Documentation and Dissemination: Create a comprehensive Wikipedia page summarizing the project's findings.
- Final Deliverables: Compile all project materials, including a well-documented GitHub repository.
Deliverables
Methodology
Ethical Theories
Data
Model Selection
Model Fine-Tuning
Performance Evaluation
Quality Assessment
Limitations
References
- ↑ Powers, Thomas M., and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, 'The Ethics of the Ethics of AI', in Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (2020; online edn, Oxford Academic, 9 July 2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.2