WikiBio: Difference between revisions
Michal.bien (talk | contribs) |
Michal.bien (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| 6 || 12.11-19.11 || Try with XLNet model, more input data, explore evaluation methods|| Worse results with XLNet (even with more input data), Subjective quality assessment and Bleu/Gleu methods | | 6 || 12.11-19.11 || Try with XLNet model, more input data, explore evaluation methods|| Worse results with XLNet (even with more input data), Subjective quality assessment and Bleu/Gleu methods | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 7 || 19.11-26.11 || Start evaluation surveys and automatic evaluation, improve GPT-2 input data|| | | 7 || 19.11-26.11 || Start evaluation surveys and automatic evaluation, improve GPT-2 input data|| Survey started, introduced full-article generation with sections | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 8 || 26.11-3.12 || Productionalization, finish evaluation|| .. | | 8 || 26.11-3.12 || Productionalization, finish evaluation|| Created wikibio.mbien.pl to present our results and started working on API for page uploads | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 9 || 3.12-10.12 || Productionalization, evaluation analyse || ... | | 9 || 3.12-10.12 || Productionalization, evaluation analyse || ... |
Revision as of 12:12, 9 December 2020
Motivation
The motivation for our project was to explore the possibilities of natural-language generation in the context of biography generation. It is easy to get structural data from the Wikidata pages, but not all the Wikidata pages have a corresponding Wikipedia page. This project will showcase how we can use the structural data from the Wikidata pages to generate realistic biographies in the Wikipedia pages format.
Project plan
Week | Dates | Goals | Result |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.10-15.10 | Exploring data souces | Selected Wikipedia + Wikidata |
2 | 15.10-22.10 | Matching textual and structural data | Wikipedia articles matched with wikidata |
3 | 22.10-29.10 | First trained model prototype | GPT-2 was trained on english data |
4 | 29.10-5.11 | Acknowledge major modelling problems | GPT-2 was trained in Italian, issues with Wikipedia pages completion and Italian model performances |
5 | 5.11-12.11 | Code clean up, midterm preparation | Improved sparql request |
6 | 12.11-19.11 | Try with XLNet model, more input data, explore evaluation methods | Worse results with XLNet (even with more input data), Subjective quality assessment and Bleu/Gleu methods |
7 | 19.11-26.11 | Start evaluation surveys and automatic evaluation, improve GPT-2 input data | Survey started, introduced full-article generation with sections |
8 | 26.11-3.12 | Productionalization, finish evaluation | Created wikibio.mbien.pl to present our results and started working on API for page uploads |
9 | 3.12-10.12 | Productionalization, evaluation analyse | ... |
10 | 10.12-16.12 | Final Presentation | ... |
Data sources
In this project, we make use of two different data sources:
- Wikidata is used to gather the structured information about the people who lived in the Republic of Venice. Multiple information are extracted from their wikidata entries, such as: birth and death times, professions and family names. To gather this data from wikidata, a customizable SPARQL query is used on the official wikidata SPARQL API
- Wikipedia is used to match the wikidata entries with the unstructured text of the article about that person. The "Wikipedia" package for python is used to find the matching pairs and then to extract the Wikipedia articles matching the entries.
Generation methods
The output of the above data sources is prepared jointly in the following manner:
- All the structured entries are transformed to text, by putting the custom control token in front of them and then concatenating them together
- The resulting text is the training sample for the model
We considered two language model architectures: XLNet and GPT-2. The comparison of the models and reason of selection of GPT-2 is described below
XLNet
XLNet is a late-2019 bi-directional language model, mostly used for tasks like sentiment analysis, classification and word correction. However, it was interesting for us due to its possibility to train on and generate text samples of virtually infinite length.
Pros:
- variable text length
- modern architecture
Cons:
- bi-directionality is not of much use here and takes more memory
- considerably lower performance on text generation tasks than GPT-2
Finally, our tests has shown that we should not consider XLNet for our biography generation effort, for a number of reasons:
- there is no text sample length limit, but the GPU RAM is not, which makes the limitation to ~1500 tokens required anyway
- the model performs poorly with short inputs
- the text is gramatically correct but the coherence with semistructured data is very bad, supposedly due to bi-directional nature of the model
GPT-2
GPT-2 is an early-2019 Causal (left-to-right) Language Model. It it widely used for language modeling for text generation, and as such it was perceived as the best shot to get the decent language modeling performance.
Pros:
- modern architecture
- left-to-right: memory-efficient
- widely used for text generation
Cons:
- fixed 1024 tokens context frame
The model performed well to understand the semi-structured input based on the underlying wikidata. It allowed generating short, but consistent biographies.
Example generation output
- Input: <|start|> Marco Polo <|description|> Painter <|professions|> Painter, Writer <|birth|> 1720 <|death|> 1793 <|summary|>
- Output: Marco Polo (1720 – 1793) was a German painter of a distinguished life of high quality. In 1740 he was the first to paint in an Italian Renaissance style. He served as the painter of Giovanni Venez in Venice; his brother was Giovanni Magnan and daughter was a painter of his own time, Marco Polo. During his career he collaborated with the great Venetian painter Giovanni Battista Gugliati in the work for the Porte della Prudina, which was published in 1714. After his death, he would leave his paintings at Venice for the Palace of Santa Martina.