Widows in Venice

What is left to do

Hello my fellow teammates! To be more structured in what is left to do and so that we don't forget anything important, here is a todolist :)

Once you have done something, please remove the point from the list

Before sunday evening:

• Motivation and description of the deliverables (5%) (>300 words)

• Detailed description of the methods - Methodology(5%) (>500 words)
  • Nathanaël add for rent analysis
  • Eglantine do you know how much we need for the property analysis? I'm not so sure about how detailed we have to do this, but its supposed to be 500 words....

• Quality assessment and discussion of limitations (5%) (>300 words)
  • here everyone should add theirs
  • when everyone has added we can write it into a fluent text

• introduction + historical backround and motivation
  • maybe Nathanaël can talk briefly about the historic context and motivation?

• conclusion and continuation
  • every one adds continuation
  • one person writes conclusion once all results are written
• Results
  • catastici property analysis
  • compariosn cata and sommarioni property analysis, are there any overreaching trends?

• deliverables - what should we write here?

Monday:

• everyone reads the whole wiki, focus points:
  • logical flow of the text
  • are the findings contextualised within the broader political and economic shifts in venice
  • fix small mistakes
  • if anything needs to be discussed, write it down

Tuesday:

• group meeting
  • discuss how to make git repository nice
• prepare presentation

Before final delivery:

• proofread the finale changes
• remove todo list hehe

Introduction

Widows in historical societies often occupied a unique socio-economic position, navigating the dual challenges of loss and the constraints of societal structures. This project seeks to explore the socio-economic status and property dynamics of widows as recorded in two historical datasets: the Catastici and the Sommarioni. By comparing these records, it aims to uncover patterns in property ownership, tenancy, and rent payments among widows, shedding light on their economic mobility and societal roles.

The analysis is guided by several key questions. First, it seeks to identify and contextualize the widows recorded in both datasets, gathering demographic and economic details such as names, property statuses, and rent information. From this foundation, the study explores whether widows were more likely to be property owners (landlords) or tenants, offering insights into their relative economic standing.

Another critical focus is the comparison of rent dynamics. The project investigates whether widows paid different rents compared to other tenants for similar properties, exploring potential evidence of preferential treatment or discrimination. Additionally, by comparing widows’ ownership or tenancy statuses across the two datasets, the study examines changes in their economic positions over time—did widows acquire more properties or experience economic decline? Finally,... what do we do at the end, how do we conclude??

Through this multi-faceted approach, the project aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of widows’ socio-economic roles and property dynamics, offering a nuanced perspective on gender, property, and economic mobility in historical contexts.

(example for introduction from chat - need to double check that it coincides with project and that it doesnt include things we didnt do)

Historical backdrop Here is the notes we have written previously: Where do we want to find this information? What are good sources to use? --> Google Scolar?

When reading about the history, add knowledge here with references to the sources used.

Venice is part of the Venetian Republic. It falls to Napoleon in 1796. Venice is given to the Austrian Monarchy by the French Republic as part of the Treaty of Campo Formio. Then it became French again and then Austrian.

https://www.napoleon-series.org/research/government/diplomatic/c_campoformio1.html

There is no major Palgue Epidemy during our period of focus [15]

The Venetian Society has strong gender roles and has a class system:

- Patricians (there names are probably in the libro d'Oro - Citizens (Popolani) - Commoners

I wish I had access to : [16]

this looks cool : [17]

Motivation

Project Plan and Milestones

The project is structured on a weekly basis, to ensure an even progression and workload. Each week has a clearly defined goal. The plan spans from the initial setup and data extraction through to final analysis and presentation, with clear milestones throughout.

The first phase of the project (07.10 - 13.10) is focused on defining the project's scope and structure. Here the focus was on creating a common understanding of the project to ensure good collaboration in the group. The following week data extraction of the widows in the two datasets started. In addition a review of historical papers on widows and Venice was done, providing the necessary context for the research (14.10 - 20.10). The analysis then shifted towards examining the widows mentioned in the Sommarioni and Catastici records. This stage involved comparative rent analysis and property ownership evaluation (8.10 - 03.11).

The mid-project milestones included a midterm presentation on 14.11, with further development of the analysis through the end of November (11.11 - 24.11). This phase focused on completing the property ownership and comparative rent analyses, as well as beginning to explore widow heritage and social aspects, such as the frequency of titles like "Vedova" and "Consorte" used in the records. These findings were progressively written into a shared wiki.

The final analysis phase, beginning 02.12, was dedicated to comparing the results of the previously conducted analyses, and identifying overarching trends related to widows in Venetian society. The last steps of the project (09.12 - 15.12) will involve finishing the wiki documentation and preparing the final presentation.

The project will conclude with the delivery of the GitHub repository and wiki on 18.12, followed by the final presentation on 19.12.

For a detailed overview of the workflow and corresponding milestones, see the table below.

Workflow

Week	Task
07.10 - 13.10	Define project and structure work
14.10 - 20.10	Write code to extract widow data Read historical papers on widows and Venice
21.10 - 27.10	Autumn vacation
28.10 - 03.11	Comparative rent analysis (catastici) Property ownership Heritage
04.11 - 10.11	Analysis: - Property ownership - Comparative rent analysis Prepare for the presentation
11.11 - 17.11	Midterm presentation on 14.11 Continue analysis
18.11 - 24.11	Finish property ownership analysis - Sommarioni & Catastici Finish comparative rent analysis - Catastici
25.11 - 01.12	Start widow heritage analysis
02.12 - 08.12	Compare all analyses to identify general trends for widows Interpret some of the results
09.12 - 15.12	Finish writing the wiki Prepare the presentation
16.12 - 22.12	Deliver GitHub + wiki on 18.12 Final presentation on 19.12

Dataset presentation

For this project, two primary datasets are used as the foundation for research: the Catastici and the Sommarioni. These historical records provide information about property ownership, income, and land use in Venice.

• 

  Catastici

• 

  Sommarioni [3]

Catastici

The Catastici is a historical register comprising 32,123 records, collected through door-to-door surveys within a parish. The sequence of entries reflects the route taken during data collection. The original register contains five main columns of information:

• Owner information
• Tenants
• Income from rent
• Place name
• Urban function

The entries vary in detail, as there was no strict data format. Some records are highly detailed, while others lack certain information. During standardization and digitization, additional columns were created to improve data usability, such as Family Name and Owner Title.

For analysis, the transcription version "catastici_text_data_20240924.json" is used. This dataset includes both the original and standardized columns.

Sommarioni

The Sommarioni is a cadaster from 1808, documenting properties and parcels in Venice alongside their assigned parcel numbers. In total it has 23,400 entries. The dataset is tabular and contains the following core information:

• Parcel Number: Corresponding to a specific property
• Owner Information: Listing the property owner
• Quality: Describing the function or use of the property

Similar to the Catastici, additional columns were added post-digitization to capture supplementary details. Unlike the Catastici, the Sommarioni does not include information about tenants of rented properties.

Methodology

Property ownership analysis

For the property ownership analysis for the widows mentioned in the Catastici and Sommarioni a similar approach was used. First the widows where located in the relevant columns using the keywords "vedova", meaning widow, and "consorte", meaning wife of dead husband. After filtering the datasets using row-wise text matching for these keywords, the entries of the widows were saved. These new datasets were then used as the basis of further analysis.

This study provides different visualizations of the Catastici and the Sommarioni data relative to widows. Given the nature of the datasets, the data this study retrieves gives information on Venice properties ownership at that time.

Heritage analysis

To explore inheritance patterns of widow-owned properties in Venetian records, two approaches where used:

Linking Catastici to Sommarioni Properties owned by widows in the Catastici were linked to entries in the Sommarioni through two primary methods:

• id_napo Matching: Directly relating id_napo (parcel numbers) from the Catastici to corresponding entries in the Sommarioni.
• Geometric Matching: Comparing spatial data where id_napo values were unavailable. This method was not applied in this project due to lack of time. But one could use the coordinates given in the Catastici and link it to parcels in the Sommarioni using the geojson.

Due to the limited amount of data avialable, only 16 entries with an id_napo in the Catastici, manual inspection was conducted to identify familial or functional connections.

Linking Sommarioni to Catastici Properties listed in the Sommarioni were traced back to the Catastici using parcel numbers and name similarity.

Using the parcel numbers from the Sommarioni, they were linked with the id_napo of the Catastici. To check for familiar relations between the owners a name similarity analysis was conducted. Here computational tools like difflib were used to compare widow names between datasets, accounting for spelling variations (e.g., "Bonvicini" vs. "Bonbicini"). A similarity threshold of 0.7 was applied.

This methodology allowed for a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, addressing historical inconsistencies while exploring inheritance patterns across records.

Results

Catastici property analysis

Using the methods described in Property ownership analysis, a total of 104 unique mentions. of widows were identified in the Catastici out of the 33'297 entries. Widows names were identified when they were mentioned as either "Vedova" or "Consorte" in the column of owner names or in the column of tenants names. Since one widow can own several properties, instance were counted with and without repeats. In the tables below, counts of all mentions of widows as "vedova" and "consorte" are displayed with and without repeats.

Number of mentions of Vedova and Consorte

Mentioned As	Owner Name	Tenant Name	Total mentions
Vedova	26	55	81
Consorte	37	6	43
Total	63	61	124

Number of unique mentions of Vedova and Consorte

Mentioned As	Owner Name	Tenant Name	Total mentions
Vedova	22	49	71
Consorte	29	5	34
Total	51	54	105

As mentioned above, in total, 104 unique names of widows were identified. However, when adding each count of unique instance of both keywords vedova and consorte for both owners and tenants, we count 105 instances. This is due to one widow in the Catastici who owned one property and rented another one: Antonia Franchini vedova. Apparently, in 1740, Antonia Franchini was renting a house and a fruit roll shop (casa e bogetta da frutaroll) owned by Nobil Domina Chiara Moro Zen. The property Antonia Franchini owned was an inviamento and was not rented to anyone.

• 

  Distribution of properties owned by widows in the Catastici

• 

  Distribution of properties rented by widows in the Catastici

Comparison of the distribution of properties owned and rented by widows in each district with the general population distribution

title

title

What Eglantine still needs to do:

• write about the widows that own and rent several properties
• write about the plot of the distribution of widows across the districts (absolute and normalized plots)
• put the word cloud in introduction? ask what the team think about that
• put the graphs more nicely

Sommarioni property analysis

Using the methods described in Property ownership analysis, the study identified 659 entries related to widows out of a total of 23,400 entries in the Sommarioni. Since this dataset includes only property owners and excludes tenants, no conclusions can be drawn about the amount of widows renting properties.

Ownership Distribution

When looking at how much property one widow holds, its important to ensure that it's the same widow. When comparing the data it appears that in the 'owner' category there are 443 unique owners, whilst in the 'owner_standardised' there are only 360 unique widows. This means that there must be different spellings and errors in the way the widows are written in the 'owner' section compared to the cleaned and standardised section, which is as expected. When looking at the new list of widows, it is still possible to see the same widows, but written differently and further refinement is therefor necessary. After looking for similarities in the names, there are around 246 unique widows.

Most widows own a single property, as illustrated in the histogram, which shows an exponential decrease in ownership frequency with increasing property counts.

From the data:

• The majority of widows own one property.
• The graph shows similarities to an exponential decay.
• The maximum observed ownership is 25 properties, held by Loredana Grimani, wife of Giovanni Morosini.

Loredana Grimani

Loredana Grimani is the widow holding the most properties in Venice in 1808. This exceptional case may indicate significant wealth, and further investigation into the Grimani-Morosini family could provide more context. From the presentation given on the Venice Data[18], there is a graph from showing the distribution of family ownership - weighted by ownership portion. The graph, based on Catastici data, highlights that both the Morosini and Grimani families controlled a significant share of Venetian properties during this period. It is reasonable to assume that by the time of the Sommarioni in 1808, the Grimani family’s property holdings had remained relatively stable.

Geographic Distribution of Widow-Owned Properties

The graph compares the proportion of properties owned by widows to those owned by the general population in each district.This comparison reveals significant regional differences:

• In Cannaregio, widows own a disproportionately large share of properties compared to the general population.
• In Castello, widow property ownership is notably lower than that of the general population.
• In Dorsoduro, San Marco, and San Paolo, widows own slightly more properties than average, while in Santa Croce, widows own slightly fewer properties.

These findings suggest that socio-economic and demographic factors may influence the distribution of widow property ownership across districts.

• 

  Fraction of properties owned by widows and people per district

• 

  Normalised average area of properties owned by widows in a given district

Property Size and Wealth Indicators

The figure shows what the average area of a property owned by a widows in a given district is, normalized by the average area of the properties in that district. This might give an indication of the wealth of the different districts. Though it has to be said, that the area given in the Sommarioni is likely computed from the vectorization available in the GeoJSON file.

Key observations include:

• In Castello, widow-owned properties are approximately 40% larger than the average, a notable finding considering the low number of widows holding property there. This discrepancy may reflect wealth concentration among widows in Castello.
• In Dorsoduro, the average property size for widows is comparable to the district average.
• In other districts, widow-owned properties are generally smaller than the average, suggesting a relatively worse economic situation for widows in these areas.

Property Functions

The final aspect of the analysis focuses on the types and functions of widow-owned properties. The graph below shows the distribution of properties by the number of distinct functions they serve.

From this data:

• Most properties serve a single function, while over 100 properties serve two functions.
• A smaller number of properties have three or four functions, which may reflect detailed notations in the Sommarioni or unique uses of these properties.
• Of the 659 widow-owned properties, 555 are rented (partially or fully), while 104 are not rented at all. The non-rented properties primarily include vegetable gardens (orto) and covered walkways (sottoportico).
• Only nine widows are listed as living in the properties they own, an unexpectedly low number that may merit further investigation.

Properties analysis comparison

When comparing the results of the different analysis of the Catastici and Sommarioni only the intersection of the columns from the two sets are possible to use. This is due to the datasets not containing entirely the same data. An example for something that falls outside this scope is aspect of the tenants, due to them not being mentioned in the Sommarioni.

aspects to compare:

• amount of widows found

• distribution of districts

• function of buildings

Heritage analysis

The inheritance of properties by widows in Venice offers insight into historical family dynamics and property ownership structures. This study examines links between property records in the Catastici and Sommarioni to identify patterns of inheritance. The analysis focuses on widows who owned property, as tenants are not mentioned in the Sommarioni.

Catastici to Sommarioni

Of the 61 widow-owned properties in the Catastici, only 16 contained valid id_napo values, enabling direct comparison. Manual inspection of these entries yielded the following results.

For seven of the entries there was no apparent relationship between the widow-owned properties in the Catastici and corresponding entries in the Sommarioni. For example, the property linked to id_napo 4270 (Catastici: Gerolema; Sommarioni: DA' RIVA Giovanni Battista) showed no familial or functional connection.

For another seven of the entries there is a possible relationship between the two datasets. Several cases suggested familial inheritance, often indicated by shared last names between the Catastici and Sommarioni entries. An example of this is id_napo 4896, where in the Catastici the owner of a house with a shop is called Elena Vianol (widow of Ferigo Renier). In the Sommarioni the owner is called Renier Bernardino, which is likely a family member.

Other recurring patterns seen in this analysis is that Elena Vianol (widow of Ferigo Renier) appeared in multiple instances where properties were inherited by individuals with the surname Renier. Paolina Mocenigo (widow of Michiel Morosini) showed a similar trend, with properties inherited by Morosini Elisabetta.

For some properties, both the widow's and her husband's names were recorded across different entries, possibly reflecting a time lag in property registration before and after the husband's death.

Sommarioni to Catastici

Attempting to trace properties from the Sommarioni back to the Catastici yielded 388 potential links based on matching parcel numbers. Given the volume of data, computational methods were employed to identify connections.

The analysis focused on name similarity, which presented challenges due to variations in spelling (e.g., Bonvicini vs. Bonbicini). Despite these difficulties, clear inheritance patterns were identified in several cases.

The analysis revealed clear inheritance patterns in several cases, particularly among prominent families like the Renier and Morosini. These findings suggest that property often stayed within family lines, with widows playing a transitional role in ownership. Discrepancies in name spelling, inconsistent recording practices, and incomplete historical data hindered efforts to establish conclusive links for many properties. These limitations highlight the need for refined computational techniques and deeper contextual understanding in future research.

Rent Analysis

What is the economical situation of widows in Venice in 1740 ?

When looking the entire city of Venice, we find only 120 properties involving widows from a total of more than 30k. This is about 0.36% of properties. We could expect this number to be closer to 15%. We are identifying the widows with keywords (consorte and vedova), so we miss all the widows that are mentioned with only their name. Also, widow can remarry or stay with family or at a convent where they might not be registered as tenants.

Classification : Jewish and Nobles

Widows live very different situations depending on their socioeconomic situation, the number of children they have, if they remarry or not. To understand the rent paid and earned by widows we need to understand what kind of widows we can find in the Catastici. A relevant separation we can make is to separate the nobility. An other separation would be to isolate the Jewish society from the rest of the Christian society because they are very different.

Widows in the Catastici are always either tenants or owners of a place. Only one property (out of 745) in the Jewish Ghetto is owned by a noble and it does not involve widows.

Widow Classification in Venice

	Nobility	Jewish	Other
Tenants	2	5	45
Owners	13	19	19

In Venice out of 33297 properties, 9521 are owned by nobles(about 28%). (though nobles most likely represent a way smaller percentage of the population). For widows out of 51 widow-owned properties, 13 are owned by nobles. This is about 25% of properties. Out of 33297 properties, 455 are rented by nobles (about 1.3%). For widows, out of 52 widow-rented properties, 2 are rented by nobles (about 4%). We will overlook those arguably small differences and claim that the proportions of nobles are the same for widows than for the rest of Venice.

Charity

Not everyone is paying rent with money, or even paying rent at all. People can pay rent with money or goods (like sugar). However, no Widow owners was found receiving payment in goods and no widow tenants was found paying in goods. Properties with no rent paid (no good and no money) fall into three categories :

• charity, (for instance : "gratis": free , "per carità": per charity, "per grazia": per grace, "amore dei": for the love of God)
• refusal to pay, ("giurò non pagar affitto": swore not to pay rent)
• no comment

It is difficult to determine if no comment entries are mistakes and rent was actually paid or if they fall into charity or some sort of agreement between owner and tenants. But, if we only focus on entries for which we are sure that they are charity, it is clear that charity towards widow tenants is almost 7 times higher than charity in general. Widow owners were not found practicing charity, but remember that charity is rare and there is not a lot of widow owners, so this might not be a significant result.

Charity in Venice

	Total number of properties	Properties where no rent is paid (no good and no money)	Mentioned as charity
Venice	33,297 (100%)	3,115 (9.35%)	169 (0.50%)
Widow Owners	61 (100%)	10 (16.39%)	0 (0%)
Widow Tenants	59 (100%)	4 (6.78%)	2 (3.39%)

Rent in Venice [6]

The scale of Venice

If we now only consider properties for which we have quantifiable rents paid with money, we find that widows pay about 40 lirae less than median rent per property and when owning a place, they earn about 40 lirae more than median rent per property. Those difference represent a 30% difference to median rent.

A possible explanation for widows renting at lower price would be that they get discounts due to their social status. But, this type of positive discrimination towards widows wouldn't explain why widows own properties that are rented at a higher price. Considering the previous observation that charity is rare, this phenomena might be a consequence of our hypothesis : poor tenat widows live in small, cheap places while rich widow owners possess big, expensive houses.

But this asks further questions: Are those properties located in specific cheap or expensive neighborhoods ? Where are widows renting ? Where do they own properties ? And are we sure that what we observe at the macro level of the city still holds at more micro levels ?

Median Rent and Population in Venice

Median Rent	Widow Owners Median Rent Difference	Widow Tenants Median Rent Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
124.0	+ 37.2	- 37.2	29999	48	55

Districts of Venice [7]

The scale of the districts

If we zoom in to the scale of districts, we can see that despite the high variations in rent between districts, the pattern of owners owning more than median rent and tenants renting at lower prices holds in almost every district.

We also see that widows are not present in equal proportions in each district. In particular, the Ghetto is very dense with both widow owners and widow tenants. This result can be put in relationship with what we suspect about the difference between the Venetian, catholic society where widows were encouraged to remarry or become nuns and could often only gain temporary control of their late husband's business and the Jewish society of the Ghetto that gave more autonomy to widows allowing them to be part of the workforce for instance. It is likely that widows found in other districts are facing a strong social incentive to remarry. Probably, most of them will remarry or become nuns in the months or years following 1740.

Widow tenants are present in good proportions in the Ghetto, Santa Croce and Cannaregio. Widow owners are present in good proportions at The Ghetto and a bit in Castello.

Median Rent in the districts

Sestiere	Median Rent	Widow Owners Median Rent Difference	Widow Tenants Median Rent Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Marco	210.8	+ 37.2	0.0	5697	5 (0.09%)	4 (0.07%)
Castello	124.0	+ 99.2	- 43.4	5774	14 (0.24%)	8 (0.14%)
Cannaregio	124.0	+ 55.8	- 6.2	6016	6 (0.10%)	20 (0.33%)
San Polo	142.6	+ 24.8	- 43.4	2930	3 (0.10%)	3 (0.10%)
Santa Croce	111.6	- 12.4	- 37.2	3218	5 (0.15%)	10 (0.30%)
Dorsoduro	86.8	+ 40.3	- 24.8	5835	4 (0.07%)	5 (0.08%)
Ghetto Novossimo	124.0	+ 24.8	- 62.0	529	11 ( 2.08%)	5 (0.94%)

Median Rent in the districts

Sestiere	Median Rent	Widow Owners Median Rent Difference	Widow Tenants Median Rent Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Marco	210.8	+ 347.2	0.0	5,697	25	4
Castello	124.0	+ 124.0	- 43.4	5,774	19	8	80.6	248.0
Cannaregio	124.0	+ 124.0	- 6.2	6,016	7	20	117.8	248.0
San Polo	142.6	+ 27.9	style="color:red; font-weight:bold;" | - 43.4	2,930	10	3	99.2	170.5
Santa Croce	111.6	+ 15.5	- 37.2	3,218	6	10	74.4	127.1
Dorsoduro	86.8	+ 130.2	- 24.8	5,835	5	5	62.0	217.0
Ghetto Novossimo	124.0	+ 24.8	- 62.0	529	11	5	62.0	148.8

Median Rent for Nobles in the districts

Sestiere	Median Rent	Widow Owners Median Rent Difference	Widow Tenants Median Rent Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Marco	272.8	+ 5.17	-	490	1	0
Castello	148.8	+ 136.40	-	1,492	11	0
Cannaregio	148.8	+ 347.20	+ 99.2	3,618	5	15
San Polo	124.0	+ 46.50	-	99	4	0
Santa Croce	124.0	+ 31.00	- 27.9	1,809	7	5
Dorsoduro	93.0	+ 341.00	-	2,467	1	0
Ghetto Novossimo	24.8	-	-	1	0	0

Median Rent for Nobles in the districts

Sestiere	Median Rent	Widow Owners Median Rent Difference	Widow Tenants Median Rent Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Marco	272.8	5.166667	NaN	472	1	0	NaN	277.966667
Castello	148.8	136.400000	NaN	1392	10	0	NaN	285.200000
Cannaregio	148.8	347.200000	99.2	3388	4	13	248.0	496.000000
San Polo	124.0	46.500000	NaN	90	4	0	NaN	170.500000
Santa Croce	124.0	31.000000	-27.9	1686	6	4	96.1	155.000000
Dorsoduro	93.0	341.000000	NaN	2315	1	0	NaN	434.000000
Ghetto Novossimo	24.8	NaN	NaN	1	0	0	NaN	NaN

Let's look in detail at each district. For each of them, we can identify the parishes in which widows are involved. Parishes represent local religious communities, but people don't always belong to the parish closest to where they live. In the following plots, parishes are represented by a line encircling all of it's members. Sometimes, non members happen to fall inside the parish's shape despite not belonging to it. To be able to visualize this case, properties not belonging to the widows parishes are shown with a smaller diameter.

Rent in San Marco [8]

San Marco

San Marco is a very rich district where rent is almost double as in the rest of Venice. The widows representation in this district is quite low (less than 0.1%). Ignoring widows, the pattern of rents really highlights key commercial elements of the district. For instance the "Merceria" (the main shopping street in the parish of San Salvador) is really visible, because rent is very high on it.

Parishes of San Marco

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties Size
San Bortolomio	223.2	+ 24.8	-	503	2	0
San Luca	161.2	-	-49.6	503	0	1
San Paternian	186.0	-	+ 124.0	178	0	1
San Salvador	272.8	5.2	-	521	1	0
Sant'Angelo	186.0	-62.0	-	506	1	0
Santa Maria Zobenigo	183.4	+ 126.6	+ 529.6	256	1	2

Rent in Castello [9]

Castello

Castello has some widows, particularly owners, that really gather in specific parishes in the east of the district, in San Giovanni in Bragora, San Martin and Santa Maria Formosa. The pattern holds for parishes with enough samples.

Parishes of Castello

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties Size
San Giovanni in Bragora	124.0	+ 84.3	-52.7	399	2	4
San Martin	86.8	+ 49.6	-6.2	563	3	2
San Pietro di Castello	99.2	+ 86.8	+ 142.6	1495	2	1
Santa Maria Formosa	186.0	+ 62.0	+ 434.0	747	7	1

Rent in Cannaregio [10]

Cannaregio

Unlike in Castello, widows of Cannaregio are present in almost every parish. Tenants are better represented in Cannaregio.

Here the pattern doesn't hold in parishes like "San Marcilian" or "San Marcuola". Also, charity for widows is mentioned in San Marcuola.

Cannaregio is the district in which tenants seems to be well integrated on an economical level.

Parishes of Cannaregio

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Cancian	124.0	-	-62.0	629	0	1
San Felice	186.0	-	+ 434.0	351	0	1
San Geremia	99.2	+ 148.8	-49.6	1082	1	1
San Giovanni Grisostomo	186.0	-86.8	-	187	1	0
San Lunardo	148.8	-	-74.4	117	0	3
San Marcilian	124.0	-	+ 136.4	589	0	2
San Marcuola	117.8	-	+ 83.7	1432	0	6
Santa Fosca	124.0	+ 620.0	+ 347.2	163	1	1
Santa Maria Maddalena	124.0	-	-37.2	119	0	1
Santa Maria Nova	198.4	-	-99.2	183	0	2
Santa Sofia	136.4	-	0.0	546	0	1
Santi Apostoli	161.2	-49.6	-99.2	618	3	1

Rent in San Polo [11]

San Polo

Similarly to San Marco, widows are not very present in this San Polo.

Parishes of San Polo

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Mattio	136.4	+ 31.0	-37.2	319	2	1
San Polo	161.2	-117.8	-	353	1	0
San Toma	136.4	-	+ 24.8	272	0	2

Rent in Santa Croce [12]

Santa Croce

Santa Croce has a significant number of tenants that experience a similar situation to what we have been observing : living in lower rent places. Despite being the smallest parish, Santa Maria Mater Domini seems to be a parish with a lot of widows, more than in the rest of the district. Charity for tenants is also mentioned in this parish. All the properties owned by widows in Santa Maria Mater Domini are owned by Nobil Domina Perina Capello.

Parishes of Santa Croce

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Cassiano	186.0	-124.0	-	546	1	0
San Giacomo dall'Orio	99.2	-	-55.8	657	0	1
San Simeon Apostolo	99.2	-	-62.0	198	0	1
San Simeon Profeta	93.0	-	0.0	447	0	1
Santa Croce	111.6	-	-58.9	739	0	2
Santa Maria Mater Domini	124.0	+ 3.1	-31.0	152	4	5

Rent in Dorsoduro [13]

Dorsoduro

There are very few widows in Dorsoduro.

Parishes of Dorsoduro

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
San Raffael	74.4	-	-43.4	772	0	3
San Barnaba	124.0	+ 93.0	-	904	1	0
San Basegio	74.4	-37.2	-	359	2	0
San Gregorio	86.8	-	-24.8	487	0	1
San Pantalon	111.6	-	+ 446.4	639	0	1
Santa Margherita	99.2	+ 148.8	-	483	1	0

Rent in the Ghetto [14]

The Ghetto

Parishes of the Ghetto

Parish	Median Rent	Widow Owners Rent Median Difference	Widow Tenants Rent Median Difference	Properties	Widow Owned Properties	Widow Rented Properties
Ghetto Nuovissimo	148.8	-	+ 68.2	46	0	1
Ghetto Nuovo	124.0	+ 105.4	-55.8	207	5	2
Ghetto Vecchio	124.0	-6.2	-80.6	276	6	2

Discussion, limitations and quality assessments

should we maybe summarize, since we probably have similar limitations?

Lets make a list first:

Limitations Methodological Limitations: Were there constraints in your methodology?

• Data: when looking at the heritage between the Catastici and the Sommarioni only 16 cases were identified using id_napo. This is too few to be able to say anything concrete about all widows.
• Not all columns have values, for instance for the heritage only 16 out of 61 entries had a id_napo.

• Tools: using difflib and searching for similarities in names

Data Limitations: Issues with data quality, availability, or representativeness.

• The standardised sections, like "owner_standardised" in the Sommarioni is not fully standardised. Still some different spellings of names or additional characters.

External Validity: Can your findings be generalized to other settings or populations?

• Sommarioni no tenants so cant really say anything about them. Also maybe the poorest widows not properly represented

Quality assessment

• Data Quality: Comment on the quality, completeness, and reliability of your data.: might be errors from person writign cadaster, but also through digitization, maybe the data also wrongly represents the reality of the situation for widows? But mention that it is mostly good

• Methodological Rigor: Methods might overlook some data, maybe too narrow

• Transparency and Reproducibility: Every analysis can be found in the GitHub

and also maybe all of this should be one coherent text and not discussion, limitations and qa each on its own

Conclusion and continuation

Conclusion

Continuation

This project has been an attempt to collect knowledge on the widows living in Venetian society between 1740 and 1808. There is still plenty to uncover about how life was for them and possible research areas are described followingly.

• look at the Tassini (explain what the Tassini is) and see if and how they mention widows

• try to do more on archetypes, maybe some qualitative analysis of familis

Deliverables

The main deliverables of the project is the results of the different analysis conducted during the span of the project and the tools used to extract the different data.

• should we go into more detail on what is to be found in the git?
• maybe mention which tools can be reused when conducting further analysis
• maybe talk again about resutls

Our Github Repository

Credits

Course: Foundation of Digital Humanities (DH-405), EPFL

Professor: Frédéric Kaplan

Supervisor:

Authors: Eglantine Vialaneix, Nathanaël Lambert, Lisa Marie Njå

Date: 18.12.2024

References

• if for instance the figures of the Catastici is taken from the PP from the lecture https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/tu5waw0623hcp4537lx6u/AKx-eznaH6BRddo1goaF7OE?dl=0&e=1&preview=FDH2024-1-7-VeniceData.pdf&rlkey=jiewdfpk5ysyv92m1817sk5qc&st=01697apo, do we need to reference to it?

should include references to the historical sources used for the historical background

• how do we want to reference to slides from the lecture?

Supplementary Information

**Dictionary of Useful Words and Idioms**

Italian	English	Description
vedova	widow	Refers to a woman whose husband has passed away.
mestiere	profession	A term used to describe one's occupation or trade.
parrocchia	parish	Parishes in Venice were local religious districts, each centered around a parish church. Every house in Venice belonged to a specific parish, forming a network of smaller communities within the larger city.
sestiere	district of Venice	The name given to the districts of Venice: San Marco, San Polo, Santa Croce, Dorsoduro (which includes the island of Giudecca), Castello, and Cannaregio.
fratelli	brothers	The plural form of fratello (brother).
sorelle	sisters	The plural form of sorella (sister).
ved	widow of	An abbreviation of vedova.
quondam	son/daughter of	Literally means "formerly" or "previously." Often used in historical contexts to indicate lineage.
fratelli quondam	brothers of the father	Refers to a person and their brothers from the same father (e.g., siblings from a deceased patriarch).
fu di	of the late man	Similar to quondam, but explicitly indicates that the father is deceased.
q.m.	abbreviation of quondam	A shorthand version of quondam used in records and documentation.
sudett-o/-a/-i	part of another place	Indicates that certain rows in a table belong to one geographical or administrative area.
consorte	married with	Indicates a spouse, often implying the husband is deceased.
della fu	of the late woman	Used to indicate lineage or connection to a deceased mother.