Traghetti in Venice
Introduction and Motivation
The city of Venice is widely known for its network of canals and its iconic ferries, know as traghetti. While nowadays they mainly serve as a tourist attraction, the traghetti have played a vital role in the daily life of Venetians since the early days of the city, by enabling the movement of both goods and people [1]. By looking at ownership data from a Venetian census of 1740, this study will seek to explore who owned and how the Venetian traghetti were operated during this period.
This research will focus on three main aspects. First, we will investigate the ownership of the traghetti and try to identify the prominent entities that controlled them. We will then try to understand the motivations behind this ownership, by looking at other business ventures of the entity, its ownership layout in the city or other historical motives not necessarily found in the data.
Secondly, we will conduct a spatial analysis in order to explore the distribution of traghetti across Venice. Using the geographical data, we will try to understand the placement of the ferries throughout the city and what kind economic or societal factors determined their position. Finally, by using another historical record (the Venetian cadastre of 1808), we will try to analyse how the ownership and placement of the traghetti evolved trough the 68 years separating the two datasets.
Deliverables
Project Timeline & Milestones
Week | Task | Status |
---|---|---|
14.10-20.10 | - Define research question | |
Autumn Vacation | -------------------------- | |
28.10-03.11 | - Find and read litterature | |
04.11-10.11 | - Read litterature
- Extract owner data and provide early visualisations |
|
11.11-17.11 | - Midterm presentations
- Visualisation tool for historical maps |
|
18.11-24.11 | - Catastici and Sommarioni alignment
- Entity owned distribution - Traghetti Rental Prices Analysis |
|
25.11-01.12 | - Catastici and Sommarioni analysis (ownership change, ...)
- Specific families/entities analysis - Spatial analysis of traghetti - Start writing the wiki |
|
02.12-08.12 | - Analysis of intersections between squero and traghetti owners
- Analyse tenents (number of families?) - Compare results to present day data (if available) - Continue writing wiki |
|
09.12-15.12 | - Finish writing the wiki | |
16.12-22.12 | - Spare week |
Methodology
1. Data Extraction
The function field in the 1740_Catastici dataset was used to filter out the ferry data. We focused on different kinds of ferries in the Venice area, specifically the Italian words traghetto and gondola.
Keyword in function | Count | Denotes |
---|---|---|
traghetto | 168 | |
gondola | ??? |
2. Family Data Classification
The owner data are extracted
3. Data Feasibility Analysis
a. General Observation of Data
Length, null fields, columns that matter to our research questions and future plans.
b. Feasibility Analysis
(1) For catastici, text_data and geojson are exactly the same, except for the geometry column. The difference in geometry column is likely that they adopted difference coordinate systems, and we prefer to use the geojson one for coordinates.
(2) For sommarioni, text_data and geojson have different lengths and columns. They need to be merged according to parcel_number, because we only need sommarioni combined with catastici, not using sommarioni alone. And we use parcel_number to merge sommarioni into catastici.
(The above conclusions could be found at https://github.com/dhlab-class/fdh-2024-student-projects-ching-chi-andre-renyi/blob/align-two-dataset/validate-text_data-geojson.ipynb)
(3) Cédric told us that id_napo field in catastici is aligned with the parcel_number in sommarioni dataset. However, id_napo and parcel_number have heavy duplications. Ren Yi didn't found a proper solution yet, and we need help from TA for this problem. The duplication analysis could be found at https://github.com/dhlab-class/fdh-2024-student-projects-ching-chi-andre-renyi/blob/align-two-dataset/data-clean-merge.ipynb
Data Extraction
In order to work on traghetti, we need a way to extract each one from the data set. For this purpose we searched the keywords "Traghetto/i" in the "function" column of the dataset using regex. Whilst exploring the data during the Entity Analysis, we discovered that the keyword "Libertà" also refers to the traghetti and included it in our regex. This choice will be motivated in the Discussion section.
Entity Analysis
To understand who owns rents the traghetti, we wanted to delve into several such entities. For this process, we started by extracting all traghetto owners from the data set and made and histogram of traghetto ownership by Entity and Family. This gives us an idea of the most important families and entities in the traghetto business. Based on the results, we chose several specific entities that were interesting, for which we did a more in-depth analysis. For these entities, aside from searching them in historical articles, we plotted a histogram of everything that they owned with the following categories: shops, houses, traghetti and other. This already gives us an idea of the kind of entity we are studying, by discussing the number of properties owned, or the percentage of traghetti owned by these entities. We finally plotted these properties in the Venice map, to try and find any patterns for the placement of the traghetti.
Our work for the tenants followed relatively the same pattern. We found which families rent traghetti the most, then tried to find if there is a correlation between who rents and who they rent it from. Finally, we also plotted the proprieties they rented on the Venice map.
Catastici and Sommarioni merging
How it worked
Spatial Analysis
Methods to do it I guess
Discussion
Data Extraction
While at first we did not think to include the key word libertà in our traghetto research, we found that they also refers to traghetti. Firstly, all traghetto entries in our dataset are in the form of libertà di traghetto, while all libertà entries appear jointly with traghetto or alone. Moreover, when we plot libertà entries on the map, their location appear in the same places, or as we would expect traghettos to appear.
In addition, we found that ownership stayed relatively similar with or without the addition of the libertà keyword. We still find Filosi or Corner at the top of the families list and Milizia da Mar or Ospedale della Pietà at the top of the entities list.
Finally, we found in a Venitian dictionnary written in 1856 that the word libertà is directly related to the traghetto business and means the “licence” to exploit a Traghetto in Venice [2]. Thus, based on this evidence, we can affirm that the keyword libertà is referring to traghetti and we will include them in our analysis. We hypothesize that the difference between libertà and libertà di traghetto in our dataset is based on the understanding of the Venician adminitistration, where it would be understood that libertà would exclusively refer to the traghetti, making the last word redundant.
Entity analysis
As discussed in the Methodology section, we started by plotting the traghetto ownership (for visibility, we excluded any entity or family that owns two or less traghetti):
In the entity column, two stand out: Milizia da Mar and Ospedale della Pietà. We will choose to focus on these two. Concerning the families, several stand out, but we will choose to focus on the families Venier and Celini.
Milizia da Mar
The Milizia da Mar is the name of the navy of Venice. Knowing this fact, and the importance of traghetti in the mobility of the city, it is natural that this organ would own this crucial utility. This is shown in the following histogram:
Ospedale della Pietà
The Ospedale della Pietà is one of the three Ospedali Grandi (charitable institutions and orphanages). This Ospedale is famous for its musical school, Antonio Vivaldi himself having teached in this institution (add reference??). It is thus surprising to find this institution this high in the traghetto business, especially when the other two Ospedali do not own any traghetti.
If we look at the Ospedale’s properties, we find that they specialise in housing. Knowing the purpose of the institution this is not surprising, as either to make money to subsidise their charitable work or to pay the famous music teachers, a good number of homes would be needed. What is interesting is that traghetti make up 15% of all properties owned by the institution and almost 50% of non-housing. The traghetti are thus a good portion of the investment from the Ospedale.
Finally, we tried to understand why Ospedale would own traghetti. We made the hypothesis that the placement of the traghetti would be either around their main building, to both give employment to the orphans they would welcome and to allow people to come to their building, or near their shops and houses to facilitate movement between their properties.
Instead, we this distribution. We see a high density of ownership around the Ospedale building, while many traghetti and general properties are scattered across the city. Unfortunately, it is hard to provide a satisfactory explanation of this data. Most of the proprieties could come from inheritance, where a childless family would give their properties to a charitable institution, but that does not explain the amount of traghetti owned by the Ospedale. Moreover, no article or book that we have found touches on this specific subject, leaving the only clues to be found probably in the archives of the Ospedale itself.
Venier
The Venier noble family is one of the most important families in Venice (citation and further explaining?). As such, seeing that they are the family owning the most traghettos, it would be interesting to analyse them further. Like the previous instances, we started by looking at the family’s ownership situation. In this case, we included palaces as a separate category to show the social status of the Veniers.
Like the case of the Ospedale, the Venier family owns mostly houses and apartments. Being one of the richest families in Venice this result is not surprising. What is notable is the number of traghetti owned by the family compared to the other noble families, like the Pisani or Grimaldi families (families that had Venitian doges around 1740) (citation?). This discrepancy might be understood by looking at the locations of the Venier’s traghetti.
This map displays the position of the traghetti and palaces belonging to the Venier family. Unlike the Ospedale map, we can observe that the traghetti are in specific clusters, and mostly near the family’s palaces in the Rialto and in the south of the city. One can then hypothesize that the traghetti owned by the Venier family would serve to connect their palaces in the south to the important centres of the city.
Celini
Unlike the Veniers, the Celini family is not a noble family and not much is known about them. Thus, their position as the fourth family owning the most traghetti is remarkable. We can look at their ownership status to try and learn more about the family.
Indeed, the Celini family only owns traghetti and a few houses. It would seem to be a family with a history of working and managing traghetti.
By looking at their ownership make, we can see that all their traghetti are at one end of the grand canal, right in front of the Basilica Santa Maria della Salute. We can then hypothesize that there would be a lot of movement at that crossing, which a family passing the traghetto business through generations would have access.
Conclusion
Appendix
References
BOERIO, Giuseppe, Dizionario del dialetto veneziano, Venice: Tipografia di Giovanni Cecchini, 1856, 976 p., URL: https://www.google.ch/books/edition/Dizionario_del_dialetto_veneziano/OGwoAAAAYAAJ?hl=it&gbpv=0#pli=1
HUFFMAN, Kristin Love, A View of Venice: Portrait of a Renaissance City, Durham: Duke University Press, 2024, 414 p.
QUILLIEN, Robin, « Apprentissages et voies d’accès au métier de barcarolo à Venise à l’époque moderne (XVIe-XVIIIe siècle) », Mélanges de l’École française de Rome - Italie et Méditerranée modernes et contemporaines, n°131-2, 2019, p. 273-283, DOI:https://doi.org/10.4000/mefrim.6651
ZANELLI, Guglielmo, « Gondole e traghetti », Matematica e cultura, n°1, 2011, p. 59-66, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1854-9_5