Venice Families and Real Estate
Introduction
In this project we take the reader back in time, through our Venetian Time Machine, to two critical points in Venice’s history: 1748 and 1808. Rife with conflict, development, and Venetian love, these two period offer a look into the life before us. The composition of cities, the family power dynamics, and the cities progressions. We’ll call the data from 1748 the Catastici the data from 1808 the Cadaster. The Catastici and the Cadaster hold information about who owned buildings in Venice in the years 1741 and 1808. In order to find out how power shifted between families in this time, we will look at the change in real estate between these years.
Motivation
“Life in the state of nature is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” - Hobbes
History has repeatedly shown us that empires rise and fall, cities evolve and change, and families battle for power. Up until now, historians have relied largely on diaries, archives, interviews, and city plans to qualitatively track these dynamics. But, while effective at understanding a static picture of a city through the lens of a few families, it becomes increasingly complex to track the evolution of an environment. The Venice Time Machine Project has aimed to digitize large swaths of archival data to permit new forms of analysis that up until now have not been possible. In our research we focus on two new sources of data, Venice’s 1748 Catastici and 1808 Cadaster. These two geographic datasets contain information about parcels of land across Venice like ownership, tenants, area, and category of property. In this project we use these data sources to paint a static picture of Venice in both periods, and then track its evolution during a period rife with conflict, like Napoleon’s invasion in 1797. After conducting the analysis, we create a website to present the data and findings in a visually appealing way, which can be of use for future Venice researchers.
Plan and Milestones
First Steps
The first step working on the project was to familiarize ourselves with the datasets. We started working on the cadaster, as we assumed it would be easier to handle. After extracting some general information about the owners of the parcels, quickly we had to realize that the parcel owner column of the dataset is not homogenous in the way it is constructed. This is due to the way the data was extracted, and as it is based on scans of hand written documents, we found we had to deal with all kinds of problems associated with handwritten documents.
The Sudetto problem
The sudetto problem appeared quite early when working with the cadaster from 1808. Whenever multiple consecutive parcels have the same owner, most of the later entries have no owner specified anymore but the value of the column is 'sudetto'. Sometimes the later entries still contain the actual name of the parcel owner, in addition to 'sudetto'. In order to solve this problem, we iterated once through the entire dataset and filled in all the 'sudetto' with the value of the previous parcel owner.
Family names
Since most of our analysis is based on families and we assume that if a owner of a parcel has the same surname as another, they belong to the same family, extracting the family names was one of the first tasks we attempted to tackle. In the Cadaster we assume that for most of the areas (all except Canareggio) the surnames of parcel owners are written in capital letters. Using this information, we managed to extract some family names from the cadaster using a simple regex pattern matching. However, some other entities are also written in all capitals, especially public institutions. The extracted names were then compared to a list of familiy names we received. The list contains information about families in old venice like their noble status. Unfortunately, the list also contains all names of public institutions, so it became redundant to our purposes. Hence, a list of names of public institutions (by no means complete) was used to filter the extracted names.
For the catastici from 1741, it was found that approximately 40% of the entries for entry owner column are under the format 'name surname' so they were rather easy to extract. Additionally, assuming that the order of the names is correct, it was simple to extract family names and even names of the owners. For the other 60% of the dataset, it is not yet clear if there is a specific format.
Date | Task | Completion |
---|---|---|
Week 5 |
|
✓ |
Week 6 |
|
✓ |
Week 7 |
|
✓ |
Week 8 |
|
✓ |
Week 9 |
|
✓ |
Week 10 |
|
|
Week 11 |
|
|
Week 12 |
|
|
Week 13 |
|
|
Week 14 |
|